Windows Vista SP1 Gaming Performance

Written by Tim Smalley

March 25, 2008 | 14:54

Tags: #1 #changes #difference #down #evaluation #lower #one #pack #performance #reduction #review #service #slow #sp1 #speed #vista #windows

Companies: #test

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

Publisher: Activision

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare is different to all previous Call of Duty games, as it moves the action out of the World War II era and into the modern day. We have used the full version of the game with the 1.5 patch applied.

The game runs on a proprietary engine, which includes features like true world dynamic lighting, HDR lighting, dynamic shadowing and depth of field. Unlike most triple-A games that were launched late in 2007, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare only uses a DirectX 9.0 renderer and, given the realistic nature of the graphics, it proves that there's still life left in the old dog!

For our gameplay testing, we did a 90 second manual run through in the second mission of the game. All of the in-game settings were set to their maximum values, including texture details which were configured to 'Extra'. The 'Dual Video Cards' option was enabled for the multi-GPU configurations, but was disabled for all single GPU cards.

Finally, anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering were controlled from inside the game.


ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2


Call of Duty 4 - ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2

DirectX 9.0, Maximum Detail

  • 1680x1050 4xAA 16xAF
  • 1920x1200 0xAA 16xAF
  • 1920x1200 4xAA 16xAF
  • 2560x1600 0xAA 16xAF
  • 2560x1600 2xAA 16xAF
    • 45.0
    • 27.0
    • 42.6
    • 25.0
    • 55.9
    • 31.0
    • 55.8
    • 31.0
    • 38.3
    • 22.0
    • 36.2
    • 22.0
    • 39.6
    • 21.0
    • 39.4
    • 21.0
    • 27.0
    • 16.0
    • 25.7
    • 16.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Frames Per Second
  • Vista + Hotfixes (avg)
  • Vista + Hotfixes (min)
  • Vista + SP1 (avg)
  • Vista + SP1 (min)

What's disappointing here is that anti-aliasing performance on the Radeon HD 3870 X2 has actually got worse with Windows Vista Service Pack 1 installed! Performance drops by around six percent with 4xAA enabled and about five percent with 2xAA - that's not good news for the 3870 X2, because the architecture is known for having poor anti-aliasing performance to start with.

Nvidia GeForce 9800 GX2


Call of Duty 4 - Nvidia GeForce 9800 GX2

DirectX 9.0, Maximum Detail

  • 1680x1050 4xAA 16xAF
  • 1920x1200 0xAA 16xAF
  • 1920x1200 4xAA 16xAF
  • 2560x1600 0xAA 16xAF
  • 2560x1600 2xAA 16xAF
    • 86.3
    • 56.0
    • 89.9
    • 57.0
    • 114.6
    • 71.0
    • 115.2
    • 70.0
    • 72.5
    • 29.0
    • 75.5
    • 47.0
    • 83.4
    • 50.0
    • 84.1
    • 51.0
    • 59.5
    • 18.0
    • 62.5
    • 41.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
Frames Per Second
  • Vista + Hotfixes (avg)
  • Vista + Hotfixes (min)
  • Vista + SP1 (avg)
  • Vista + SP1 (min)

On the other hand, Nvidia's anti-aliasing performance increases with Vista SP1 installed and in some cases the improvement is dramatic. For example, at both 1920x1200 4xAA and 2560x1600 2xAA, the minimum frame rate increases significantly and the gaming experience was much smoother. And if that's not enough, the average frame rates increased by around four to five percent when AA was applied as well.
Discuss this in the forums

Posted by Kierax - Tue Mar 25 2008 15:22

Interesting, I have just gone to 64bit SP1 Ultimate myself, and it seems amazing in Windows yet to load into Crysis and COD4.

Posted by Andune - Tue Mar 25 2008 15:51

Nice article, i was waiting for someone to test the gaming performance of SP1, was hoping for a bigger performance gain though.
Are there any difference between 32 and 64bit?

Posted by TreeDude - Tue Mar 25 2008 15:53

The biggest thing I noticed was file copying. My boot up and shutdown did decrease a bit too though. I still have a few minor issues in Vista though. Namely my official monitor drivers refuse to install and the security center tells me AVG is off when I boot up even though it is on when the message appears. It goes away within a few seconds though and then the security center sees it correctly. I also can't run the 64bit version of UT2k4. It crashes when I change to a higher resolution. And the built in DVD decoder will not play DVDs because it says a piece of my hardware is not compliant. It has to be the actual DVD drive because my monitor and video card support HTCP. I am using VLC for now. I tried a codec pack with a DVD decoder but it came up all garbled and now Vista thinks there is no DVD decoder there anymore.

Everything is pretty minor though. All in all I really like Vista. I just wish it had more to offer. Honestly all the useful features in Vista could have been added into XP. I just wish they hadn't scrapped the new file system, that would have made it worth it.

Posted by vaderag - Tue Mar 25 2008 15:55

I'd love to actually get SP1 installed to see what the difference is for me, except every time i try i get error 80073712...
Seems a million other people are also getting this, except the trouble is, none of the solutions seem to work for me (or alot of other people for that matter) :(

Anyone know a way to fix this WITHOUT having to do a full re-install?!
null
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

In line with recent changes to data protection legislation in the UK and Europe we would like to direct you to our updated Privacy Policy here.